Sunday, August 30, 2009
The Wasp
Saturday, August 29, 2009
The scrub jay, and a hot day at the end of August
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
As the World (Wide Web) Turns
| From the NY Times, Aug. 25, 2009 "We are no longer at the point that it is acceptable to throw things at the wall and see what sticks."MICHAEL SNOW, chairman of the Wikimedia board, the nonprofit in San Francisco that governs Wikipedia, on steps to impose editorial review on articles about living people. I remember reading once about the challenges that the home telephone presented to people when first introduced. What time of day is acceptable for someone to disturb someone at home? How should the phone be answered? The computer has presented a similar challenge to us but in an even deeper and broader sense due to its amazing power to gather and share information. And the speed with which this technology changes is an added element in the mix. If we stand still we fall behind. http://www.connected-earth.com/Galleries/Shapingourlives/Livingwiththetelephone/Firstencounters/index.htmEarly phone etiquette (1922) : but we haven't been introduced ...By the early 1900s, for the upper classes a telephone call was beginning to take the place of the calling card. Instead of leaving a card and waiting to be invited, people would telephone and ask if they might pay a visit. Emily Post in her 1922 book 'Etiquette' noted: 'Custom... has taken away all opprobrium from the message by telephone and, with the exception of a very small minority of letter-loving hostesses, all informal invitations are sent and answered by telephone.' Even so, there was endless uncertainty about the etiquette involved in using the telephone - about the 'proper' way to give one's number, and to whom? Who should make the first call - man or woman? Could one call someone to whom one had not been formally introduced? Questions like these would preoccupy the etiquette writers and authorities for decades. | |
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Reflections on 9/11 Photos
Diana, my friend and neighbor across the street, forwarded to all on her email contact list some just released photos of the World Trade Center attack on September 11, 2001. Fifty-seven slides. One in particular early on made me catch my breath. It was a small single falling person silhouetted against the large. plain, white background of the building.
The slides seem to go on and on. Views from overhead, from across the water with a small Statue of Liberty in the foreground, from ground level, from the north, the south, views of the initial impact and the flames, pictures and pictures and pictures of the clouds of pulverized debris, billowing like smoke, spreading out, spreading out, spreading out.
At first I was thinking that enough was enough. There are so many pictures, and they all told the same story. But then I began to feel the cumulative affect of the pictures.
What an audacious plan, to aim an airplane like a bullet, like an arrow, at the these incredibly tall buildings jutting up into the sky above New York, the economic center of a capitalist society whose god is money, with the buildings giving the finger to these fundamentalist Muslims. These men who planned and trained and coordinated with others, the other airplanes bent on their own destructive missions, to bring America to her knees while they go to the glory of their heaven.
But this isn’t the warfare of rules, the Geneva Convention and warrior fighting warrior. The people inside these buildings were office workers in their suits and ties and skirts and dresses. They’d kissed their husbands and wives and kids goodbye that morning and got on the commuter train and thought about work or what they were going to do that night or getting braces for Sarah or whether they should ask Mother to come live with them.
I have always been amazed that there are rules of war. Isn’t the saying “all’s fair in love and war”? These men believed that to be true. And the consequences of their action are being felt still in the Middle East and here at home as our warriors leave their homes and families to return, some damaged. And some not to return. As many, and more, than the number who died on 9/11.
August 1, 2009
The Day the Earth Stood Still
sometimes i think that the day the earth stood still is happening right now not that it’s really standing still as in the movie that was to demonstrate the power that the benign alien visitor had over the events of the human race he could, or his robot could, cause the destruction of humans but in our case now we are causing our destruction
not in one day which is why we aren’t as alarmed as we should be today on the news npr of course was the story of a recent phenomenon rain on snow 20,000 musk oxen were found dead in 2004 it took awhile to figure out that rain falling on snow froze and prevented the oxen from digging through the snow to the food below another global warming event i hear it all of the time the polar bears’ ice is shrinking drought floods and developing industrialized nations china india don’t want to cut back on their global warming gasses because they want what we have and we got what we have by burning burning burning fossil fuels and we didn’t sign the kyoto agreement in 1997 but now we’re on board with climate change al gore’s an inconvenient truth probably helped but scientists say that the 20 or 30 years we’re giving ourselves to reverse our dependence on fossil fuels is still going to produce some irrevocable changes all of the animals all of the plants that will be gone for good it’s so sad i cry
valerie july 28, 2009
this was what i've heard the lang. arts teachers call free write...wanted to write something to test the newly installed iWork
and the only day the earth stood still i've seen is the first, with michael rennie and patricia neal charles and i loved it
